einen sehr interessanten kommentar habe ich hier gefunden:
http://www.buzzmachine.com/201…rmany-what-have-you-done/
ZitatAlles anzeigen“but the buildings are already in public”.
Well. Yes, they are. That is true. But that’s not the same as taking a picture of someones house and putting it online without asking their permission. Not even close.
To see the house in this article’s image I would have to fly to Germany. I would then have to drive to this house, get out of my car directly outside it and stare at it. There I could be seen doing so by the people inside, the general public and any passing police officers. The people in the house could also take a picture of me, should they be concerned as why a stranger was staring at them. They could report me to the police with any concerns. If it’s a popular road there could be multiple people starring at the house. The house owner may be looking at a crowd looking into their front window.
If you want everything public then the IP’s, google /facebook / twitter accounts of every person who has looked at your house should be posted online, showing the picture of the user, how many times they’d visited and for how long. How would people like that? Take away the mask of secrecy and see how many people want to use and protect it then.
If you’re going to defend openness you shouldn’t restrict your thoughts to one point of view.
.
